Best Articles by Dale Wolf

December 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

« Honesty? Gaming the Metrics of Customer Experience Management | Main | Webinar: Getting Customers Hooked On Your Organization »

March 04, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345294db69e200e5507683288834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Are you kidding? A PERFECT Customer Experience?:

Comments

Peter Poster

The management of the local company we have back in our town must read this blog and apply every inch of it to his supermarket! I do not believe that the customer is ALWAYS right, though they are powerful enough to bring a business down! Thanks for the post.

Call Centers India

Very Useful Information for Customer Support Services.
thnks for the latest updates and awareness.

Marketing

I read this blog and find many good theme about how a customer can be a good service
holder by kidding in many company the customer can get frosted but if you are able to give better service s to your customer they will get back to you .
our company also in this field

Call Centers in India is a leading provider of offshore contact center and business process outsourcing services.
you can visit

http://www.callcenterinindia.net

Dale Wolf

Thanks, Dave, for expanding upon the original posting. You have shared an important insight about customer retention.

Too often, we look at customers as simply vehicles for upselling, cross-selling or selling more. And, of course, we need to do that to be a successful business and to be of value to the customer.

But your insight that "we continually have an accurate, 360-degree view of the customer's perceptions, predispositions and plans" takes this discussion to a higher plane.

Many companies organize their sales teams into "hunters" and "farmers" -- the farmers presumably being responsible for the long-term relationship with the customer.

When, however, these farmers are compensated exclusively for revenue growth then that's what they focus on.

Instead they should be focused on the three points you cited. I repeat them for emphasis ... we continually must have an accurate, 360-degree view of the customer's perceptions, predispositions and plans.

If the farmers are compensated on building this knowledge base of perceptions, predispositions and plans and uses this knowledge to help and support the customer to achieve their goals, then the relationship will be solid and highly valued.

The revenue will follow.

But if the farmers are just pounding the client's halls looking for short-term revenue, the value is only to the seller and the relationship is one-sided.

And eventually, some other company will come in to that customer and win the day.

Dave Decker

I think Dale has it right, in many regards, and that perfection should and must be the standard. One complement I'd offer is this: the company which is driven to deliver and enable perfection at every level on a consistent basis HAS TO continually have answers to the most difficult and potentially damning and damaging questions, from a variety of vantage points. Switching cost used to be in vogue as a measure of how 'sticky' a vendor was to the customer. The world's flat - and getting ever flatter - so we need to know WHY the customer stays with us, WHAT options they are considering and HOW at-risk we actually are, etc. Said differently, we need to understand WHERE the customer is going, WHY this is so, and HOW we can be THE ONE (or at least one of the most important ones) to provide such a solution to their ever-evolving problems. Perfection's the right ideal, a wonderful one. But it's only hope of 'sticking' is to ensure that we continually have an accurate, 360-degree view of the customer's perceptions, predispositions and plans.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment